What criticism has been directed at the DSM-IV and DSM-5?

The criticism that the DSM-IV and DSM-5 categorize some normal behaviors as abnormal is rooted in concerns about the diagnostic criteria used within these manuals. Critics argue that certain behaviors or experiences that are common or culturally accepted can be labeled as mental health disorders, which may lead to unnecessary stigma or treatment for individuals who may not actually need intervention. For instance, normal variations in mood and behavior, such as sadness following a life event, may sometimes be diagnosed as depressive disorders, which can pathologize typical human experiences. This debate highlights the tension between medicalizing human behavior and recognizing the importance of context and individual differences in psychological assessments. By categorizing these behaviors, the DSM may inadvertently contribute to over-diagnosis or misdiagnosis, leading to a broader implication for mental health practices and treatment approaches.